# A workaround for broken 'do less' retroratchet

**URL:** <https://forum.beeminder.com/t/a-workaround-for-broken-do-less-retroratchet/1488>\
**Category:** uncategorized\
**Created:** [February 13, 2014, 8:14pm UTC](https://forum.beeminder.com/t/a-workaround-for-broken-do-less-retroratchet/1488 "2014-02-13T20:14:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Essentiae](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/dec6dc/32.png) [@Essentiae](https://forum.beeminder.com/u/Essentiae)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2014, 8:14pm UTC](https://forum.beeminder.com/t/a-workaround-for-broken-do-less-retroratchet/1488/1 "2014-02-13T20:14:43Z")

</div>

This is so obvious that I’m now embarrassed to admit I only just thought of  
it.  
If you’ve had to retroratchet a ‘do less’ goal, you’re probably aware of  
the fact that you can only chose 0 or 3 days (1 and 2 days both result in  
the same as 0 – and actually, 3 ends up with around 2.4 days). To work  
around that, just create a fake datapoint that is the size of the daily  
rate x1 (for one safe day) or x2 (for two safe days), retroratchet to 0  
safe days, and then delete the fake datapoint. It won’t help with the “safe  
days” feature, which will only let you do 0 (as 0, 1, or 2) or 2.4 (as 3),  
but it’s good if you’re creating a goal and want a buffer size larger than  
0 and smaller than 2.4.  
Hope this is useful to others.
