Beeminder Forum

An engaging chatbot, that educates about preventing cardiovascular disease

I’ve spent the last few days building a chatbot, that shows, how early diagnosis of cardiovascular disease could be increased. I thought you might wanna check it out:

cardibot.com

2 Likes

How is it a bot if the questions are pre written? :wink:

1 Like

Bot ~= Conversational Interface. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

Until AI is more advanced and accessible to developers, relying a good amount on decision trees can ensure these things are more useful and less frustrating to users.

2 Likes

Nice thought man, Keep up the good work. Atleast it will create some sort of awareness among people regarding the Cardiovascular Disease.

1 Like

On mobile at least, I can not even type a question of my own. This is not a “bot” in any sense of the way :slight_smile:

1 Like

Come on, guys. Give a man a break. Did you expect him to recreate Alexa? If you have gripes about the use of the word “bot,” take it up with the tool he’s using, landbot.io, as that’s what they call the conversational apps they allow you to build with it.

@j0hannes has done a great job.

1 Like

No, I don’t.

Not Alexa of course!

But ELIZA :wink:

1 Like

We are at all times responsible for the words we use. Especially when the originate from the marketing department of a company.

This is an innovative interface to provide information, will probably work much better than a long page with the same content. It just isn’t a “bot”. What’s wrong with being accurate in our choice of words? :slight_smile:

1 Like

No argument there. Though, really, who’s defining the correct use of the term “bot?” Your roomba doesn’t have to have a natural language interface to qualify for the moniker.

The fact is that the words “robot” and “bot” are quite fuzzy. Manufacturing machines, autonomous agents in games and virtual worlds, humanoid automatons, and conversational interfaces of varying levels of sophistication are all described as “robots” or “bots” by reasonable people who are not trying to be deceptive. Why assume that this case is any different?

1 Like

How about Wikipedia? :smiley:

Chatbots are typically used in dialog systems for various practical purposes including customer service or information acquisition. Some chatbots use sophisticated natural language processing systems, but many simpler ones scan for keywords within the input, then pull a reply with the most matching keywords, or the most similar wording pattern, from a database.

There is no dialog here just the appearance of one. You could have the same end result (in terms of user interaction) without the pretence of a dialog taking place.

The roomba is not a chatbot, for sure. :smiley: However, it is definitely a semi-autonomous moving bot. It uses a set of sensors and algorithms to determine its position and decide a route.

1 Like

I’m not convinced this is a meaningful distinction. Conversational interfaces take the form of a dialog, regardless of whether or not the user is free to form their own inputs.

Most people should not use this type of system for anything other than toys and games. Trying to navigate what amounts to an interactive fiction computer game with no indication of what the system can do and how the system expects commands to be given can be extremely frustrating for the end user who just wants to get the task done. Presenting the user with clickable responses instead of a blank input field is an elegant solution to the usability issues which plague modern chat bots.