Scarabaea's beeminder journal

This ended up a quieter week, though I had to be ready to get on a train any day, so planning was a bit iffy. I originally had breaks for the entire week for my time-heavier goals, as I didn’t know which days I will need them - but when I learned on Wednesday that I won’t have to travel this week, I moved the remaining part of the breaks to the next week. I can’t wait when I will be able to rebuild my routines without this iffiness; hopefully soon.

This week the goals that have been propelling the entirety of my post-doc project over the past two years came to an end - together with the post-doc itself. I will probably make another post summarizing the experience with this goal (and the supplementary ones, hence plural in the beginning of the sentence).

And I need to come up with some new structures that will ensure that I still work on the book project, which I started during the post-doc and have at ~60-70% ready now, even though I will be heavily occupied with teaching and other urgent responsibilities.

That’s it for this week! No new goals, no derailements.

2 Likes

I’m curious about the experience. If you end up writing that summary, I’d like to read it. (Hope the post-doc has been satisfying and the end has been a welcome change!)

2 Likes

Great, I am glad this is of interest not only to myself as an effort in documenting the process for the sake of learning on mistakes and future replication of successes.

First, what this was content-wise. A research-only post-doc, no teaching responsibilities.[1] I was expected to produce a few publications and present at a few conferences, and I have been writing a book manuscript — this was not expected, but this is my own explanation of what I have been doing here, because in my field (literature/humanities), the academic progress is still very much measured in books. This was not a continuation of my PhD dissertation topic — I know many people use the post-doc status to publish a dissertation book, but I simply couldn’t look at that material any more, so I moved on to a totally new period and some new analytical approaches.

To organize something as vague as starting a new research project that will eventually become a book, but only take final years later, when I will only be asked to justify myself after two years of doing whatever I decide to be the most expedient [2] - this surely demands creating some kind of structure, simply not to be lost in the vastness of the new thing and the multitude of possible details that it might be useful to do within it. From the content point of view, I achieved this by not writing the book manuscript at once (chapter-by-chapter) but by applying to various conferences / calls for papers and thus writing portions of what will become book chapters as articles, conference papers and so on. This created a structure of deadlines every few months, so it was easier to focus on just one thing/subtheme at a time. So, ultimately I prepared 5 publications, of which 1 is out, 2 are in production and scheduled for this March–April, 1 accepted but to be finalized yet and 1 under review after revisions. Some of these were initially prepared as conference papers, and additionally I worked on three conference papers that haven’t been made into publications/manuscripts yet. They will also enter the book in a reworked form — after all, it needs chapters that haven’t been previously published as well! :slight_smile:

So, how does one organize something this vague, with delayed consequences? Enter Beeminder, of course!

I have been tracking total time on work/studies since some time into my PhD (I mean, the very same goal; actual tracking goes way earlier) — so, initially I started with restarting this goal at an appropriate rate: work_and_study. It’s been 1776 hours over the two years, as far as raw tracking goes, averaging at slightly over 19 hours a week. (That’s taking into account 6 weeks of vacation per year, which I have been officially given — it’s just that I decided myself when to take the time off.) I know this might seem like not a large number of hours — but this is totally not counting in the hours I spent thinking about how to connect ideas while walking outside or lying awake in the middle of the night. Or, from a different perspective: this is actually close to the limit of weekly time I can spend producing ideas; I stop being productive at all if I try to consistently pull 25+ hours of such type of activity for a few weeks; kudos to those who can; this is not a competition. Understanding my limits better was actually one of the important side effects of all this time tracking effort; all further structuring that I describe below is actually directed not toward adding more hours but toward most efficiently structuring my work process within these known limits.

Tracking raw time, I soon noticed that I need some measure against getting distracted and still getting credit. So I turned TagTime back on.[3] The idea was that if a ping catches me distracted, I edit the timer entry to end at the midpoint between this “distracted” ping and the previous one, or the start of the tracking session. So that looking at instagram even “just for a second” would cost me half the time (with the pings set at 15-min average interval). And a couple of weeks in, I realized that since I am already using pings in addition to raw time tracking, I could also utilize them to another end: to urge myself start the work earlier in the day, instead of postponing to the final hours before the goal’s deadline. This brought about the main goal that helped me with this project: focused_work_early. Pings before 14:00 count as 3x, between 14:00 and 18:00 as 2x, and after 18:00 as 1x. The first year I ran it at 30/day, and for the past 13 months, at 35/day. From the technical point of view, this has been realized by having three supplementary goals that each gets data from each type of tag, which were meta-fed into a single goal. I started with the native TagTime app (which is off-schedule once you change the interval); then I switched to @CortTheWart’s implementation, as this one had parallel apps for phone and pc running on the same schedule (good when having the phone at hand just for answering the pings is a distraction in itself), and eventually I figured out the underlying schedule and wrote my own python script to run on the pc alongside @CortTheWart’s android app - a limited-functionality version that cares only about my project, not about all tags for all possible activities, but takes cares of the 3x-2x-1x reasoning by itself.

And this… worked? As can be seen from the fact that I have some actual outcomes to list (as listed above), it can probably be concluded that this worked, somehow. For 2024, I didn’t derail at all (being in the challenge for no-derails, with the extra accountability, helped!), and in 2025, I derailed a few times, since the first derailment already came a few days into January, due to the increased rate and having too much faith in a possibility to work on a flight. So I wasn’t restricted by the no-derail clause anymore, and went on to derail a few more times. (The raw-time goal, on the other hand, derailed a few times in 2024 but not in 2025. This suggests that after the switch to 35 daily units, the pings goal actually required of me slightly more effort on average than the raw time and I gained buffer for the latter.)

There was some underlying idea that having this structure will help me internalize the routine, use it as a crutch for some time and then to go beyond it on my own. This can also be seen from the fact that I increased the rate for 2025, thinking that it should be easier now, when I am well into the project, I know what I am doing etc… But probably it doesn’t work like that. I actually ran some stats at some point, slightly under a year in, checking whether there is any tendency that I started working earlier in the day by myself, ahead of the requirements, any hint that I have been in the process of internalizing them. Well, there wasn’t really any indication of that. The only thing that analysis showed is that I have been finishing the work for the day by dinner time more reliably. Which is good enough, I guess. Sometimes just going on at the same rate — on and on and on — is already a win. Especially for someone like me who benefits from restructuring the organizational systems once in a while to capitalize on their novelty. Another factor is that it’s actually not monotonous work: it’s reading something, then staring on the blank page to word my own ideas and so on. I love learning new things — getting acquainted with a new area of knowledge — and I love seeing my own ideas when they have already taken the form of a ready manuscript. But the process in-between — that I hate!

During the second year, when I agreed to produce more papers than was sane, plus there were previous ones at various stages of revision/production (requiring anything between substantial rewrites to responding to editorial queries on style to reformatting citations for the n-th time), I introduced a new type of supplementary goal, based on pomodoros. Each ran for two-three months and had a very specific list of papers/chapters, with the type of work that would count. To avoid procrastinating within the time-on-project, by “reading around” further when I should be putting words on paper. I would put on that list, for example, “for X chapter, researching and reading secondary sources only counts in the month of Y, later — only if I am searching for a specific quote to cite.” The daily requirement for those pomodoros would be lower than the simultaneous requirement for the total time, so I would be totally able to still “read around” if needed, just not to count this toward this particular goal. I really liked how this worked! I will be reusing this strategy for time-limited, bound by a list of specific tasks, bundles of effort.

For one paper, I used a word count–based supplementary goal. They don’t typically work for me, at least not when it’s manual entry. This one was, for the first time, GoogleDocs-based, and it worked substantially better for me than manually entering the number from Word/LibreOffice.[4]

The final supplementary goal was also based on word count in a Google doc, but for an ideas dump rather than for a full paper. After one particularly fruitful workshop, when the between-the-panels interactions birthed a few interesting ideas for potential co-authored papers, I decided to put them all in one file and to set the rate in a way that I will have to look at this file once in a while, add any further ideas on these ideas, including on how specifically the analysis can be implemented, or what can be an appropriate venue for this paper. I can’t say for sure if this “worked”. I am glad to have all those ideas — and further ones, as they appeared — in one place, but nothing was co-authored or otherwise brought to a further stage from that list. But I really had a pretty packed paper-writing schedule last year, so this is not necessarily a sign of a wrong strategy.

What next? I will need to figure out how to make sure I still dedicate time to this book project and all the conferences I have already unwisely agreed to participate this semester, now that my weeks will be packed with teaching.

P.S. all the N- and M-dashes in this post have been written manually, now that the forum interface allows entering them easily. And the footnotes support!


  1. I still cannot fully believe that someone decided to fund this – not that I consider my project not worthy or important, just used to more exploitative labor (as in teaching ungrateful undergrads) being expected in return for the funds, with the actual research taking place in a spare moment between those other responsibilities. ↩︎

  2. Side note: yeah, most definitely, I am writing this informal report to procrastinate from writing the formal report that is expected of me this week. ↩︎

  3. I have not been using that constantly and I have only used it to track all different types of activity for limited periods of time sporadically, as it tends to get overwhelming quickly. ↩︎

  4. But I am a bit scared of the amount of work I will need to put into reformatting the citations into LibreOffice now. Google Docs can do Zotero now; the draft even looked slick, but I have recently downloaded the paper from there to do further work, and it’s an abomination. ↩︎

2 Likes

This week has been hectic, but I am almost done with the paperwork for my new position and I have rented a place to live, which is a big yay.

I am archiving the goal that helped me work earlier in the day for the past two years, and I have started two new goals this week, both pomodoro-based:

  • work_research_2bp - this will be for the research part, to continue with my book project (2bp stands for second-book project, which is a joke in itself, as it’s not a second “book project” because I never published my dissertation book, but this project will hopefully become, structurally, what is called in academia a “second book” — in some countries formalized into a “habilitation” with an additional defense procedure) and other research outcomes, to still dedicate time to this while I will be inundated with the urgent weekly things for teaching — let’s say anything that is more about long-standing aspects that I want to be associated with my name in academia regardless of my current affiliation.

  • work_teach_admin - for the teaching part and anything that is required of me as part of this position exclusively (any workplace-required training, I can imagine).

The division is vague, of course, but I want to keep them separate, as I know well how easy it is to let the more “substantial” aspects slip when having such a teaching load. Both are weekends-off; the teaching-prep goal also has Mondays and Tuesdays off (that’s when I have to actually teach all my classes — no need to require that “prep” is happening on those days). I have also immediately derailed on this latter goal two days into its existence: traveled on that day and all the time I could work on the train I had to dedicate to some edits to the report I still had to do on the postdoc. As the goal was new, I hadn’t tweaked the post-derail respite yet, and got the following days off — which ended up being a welcome circumstance, as I didn’t have any mental space to sit down with the prep over the following days when I was arranging my documents and looking for an apartment.

As for the rate, I want to do at least 4 pomos/workday on research, and for teaching prep, I set it to the same rate but I will have to adjust it as I actually start to work: I believe it will take much more time daily, and the idea is that this goal would require me to be consistent over my days without classes.

I also have this overarching system between Beeminder and Intend, in which the spheres of my life are numbered in the same way (“goals” in Intend, tags for individual goals in Beeminder[1]), so to distinguish those two aspects above I wanted to split my previous sphere no.1 into two, but I hated that all the numbers will shift: I got used to specific numbers. But then I realized that one can start with “0” in Intend, so I managed to add a 0th sphere and keep all other numbers.

Other changes:

  • I am flattening out the lith_read goal for now (pages in a Lithuanian book I am reading for practice), but not archiving, to keep it in sight — will try to reintroduce this when I am a bit more settled and bring the book over here.
  • Also, begrudgingly, but lowering the time-based requirement for Lithuanian practice in lietuviukalba — I am keeping the lessons, because letting it go now will have it overwritten with the other language I am actively restoring now, and we are paying for the lessons for my husband’s sake anyways, but I want to lower the pressure by lowering the requirement.
  • And, correspondingly, the new goal for that other language: polski, Polish that is, which I need to revive to a usable condition, and I already started doing the language club and arranged for private lessons (is there a way to force-update a newly created Toggl goal to pull data from the past few days, so as to have some history of success in sight? — will post this question separately).

I am in severe need of a vacation, which is not coming anytime soon, but it looks like most of the uncertainty for this transition is over for now, so now: work-work-work.


  1. I use a Valtown script to auto-fill the draft of intentions for the day from Beeminder, that’s why it’s important ↩︎

1 Like

Do you use any particular methods for language learning?

My Lithuanian learning mostly consisted of lessons with a private tutor, in which we (lessons for me and my husband, as we are at the same level) mostly talked about whatever was relevant to us at the moment, got feedback on better ways to express that from the instructor, discussed appropriate grammar in use (but that wasn’t a huge focus), and also wrote something for each class and got feedback. So a lot of active production. I also create Anki cards for all the words that I encounter as new — also some collocations — and revise them regularly. Plus, I added watching videos on YouTube on topics of interest and reading for additional practice, when the level allowed me to start working with authentic language material. That’s basically it — not a very particular method, I guess, but has been working extremely well for me. I am in the B2 range after (checks the goal) just 747.5 hours of learning over the past 27 months. Definitely faster than with any language before this, but this was also the first time I studied with a private tutor instead of a group setting. So perhaps, an actual “method” recommendation (also to myself from the past) would be investing in a tutor but finding one professional and flexible enough to work with what works for this specific learner.

Definitely faster than with any language before this, but this was also the first time I studied with a private tutor instead of a group setting. So perhaps, an actual “method” recommendation (also to myself from the past) would be investing in a tutor but finding one professional and flexible enough to work with what works for this specific learner.

This is true. A few weeks with a good tutor is worth thousands hours with Duolingo. I think it makes sense, because it’s the most active method of language acquisition. It costs more, but only if you think your own time is for free.

In total, you mentioned you come from Ukraine, you speak English and you’ve had at some points in time experience with Spanish, German, Hebrew iirc, recently Lithuanian and Polish. That gives us a range of some 4-7 languages you can speak and a few more that you passively understand (some Slavic, perhaps Italian or Dutch).

Would you like to elaborate some day on levels and story behind them? It seems like a lifelong passion and I guess you have some interesting thoughts there.

1 Like

Yes, this! Especially now that one can have access to someone who really knows what they are doing, not only whoever is available geographically.

You are very attentive to what I have been mentioning throughout this thread; this is almost the full list of languages that I count. (I only “count” those that I brought at least to B1, as for the ones that I touched but didn’t get at least there, I don’t think it’s fair to claim them, regardless of the number of semesters spent on them — not much was retained.)

So, for the first five, it is hard to establish the actual order, as I started something and then stepped aside for years before I actually got to anything of notice. On academic CVs, I usually claim Ukrainian and Russian at “native” level fluency and English as “near-native.” Russian and Ukrainian — that’s clearly simply from the environment, but I was really lucky to start with English early and have good instruction at school, so I could study at the university where it was assumed that guest lecturers could teach in English and everybody would understand — quite a bold idea in Ukraine in the mid-2000s.

Then there were German and Polish. German is currently somewhere at B2, but pretty passive. This is probably the story of most time spent for least result, overall: I had multiple beginner teachers in secondary and high school, each year a new one, still students of education themselves, not really knowing how to do their job. So, after like 5 years at school, I could only skip the two first semesters in college, where I did another year, then multiple language classes in private language schools, on and off. I haven’t really been doing much for the past 10 years (checks the graph) — just 500 hours — so language production capabilities are very rusty, but I have an okay level of comprehension for authentic content, even scholarly sources. Before I got the job that I am starting now, I thought I would do a fellowship in Munich, so I tried to put in more effort in reviving it for a bit, but postponed that now.

Polish: I started at college, only actually ever took two or three semesters of formal instruction, then I started working with Polish literature and reading a lot, came to Warsaw to work with sources at the library, for months on end during my graduate studies (the first one, in Ukraine), some communication with the natives. Continued that during my second graduate school in the US, but it was assumed that I am coming with a sufficient level, so it was also mostly work with sources, not formal learning. I would say comprehension is at a near-native level, but production skills got very rusty, especially since my brain decided to overwrite it with Lithuanian, which I am actively trying to undo now. ~B2-C1, I would say, but with a lot of interference from Ukrainian and Lithuanian. (It’s a very inappropriate moment to discover a fun “false friend” when discussing a lease contract.)

And then I actually started counting them in order.

Sixth was Hebrew: I usually say it gets easier once you reach your sixth language. At least it’s where it got for me. Or one could say I was very lucky to have an exceptional instructor. I had no reason to start Hebrew specifically, but there were language classes that were offered at an additional cost at my university and those that were offered for free, so I roamed into the Hebrew class one year (after already having seen many language teachers who had no idea what they were doing), and then I thought to myself after a few meetings: wow, I don’t know why on earth I would need Hebrew, but I should observe him to learn how one can teach a language. I ended up marrying him[1]. Four years in Ukraine and two intensive summer schools in Israel brought me to what they call “exemption exam,” but I wouldn’t claim that’s really the near-native level this wording might suggest. Even at my most fluent times, I still struggled with many types of authentic content, especially fast speech in videos. I started teaching a few years in, as there was a need for a teaching assistant, then on my own behalf, and also did that for a year during the US grad school, but since ~2020 I simply had to shift focus elsewhere and currently active production skills are pretty rusty.

Seventh was French, which was required at my Ukrainian grad school for a year, and then I took a few more classes in the US. ~B1 probably, I would be able to find my way in the language environment if necessary, but that’s very far from full comprehension. (One situation when it was indispensable was a trip to Tunisia, surprisingly. In France, despite the common stereotypes, people preferred using English over listening to my bad French.) Haven’t touched that for quite a while.

Eighth was Spanish — started that in the US: we planned a trip to Mexico, I duolingo’ed Spanish for a few weeks before the trip, and then I simply showed up in the third semester of Spanish after the trip. I have no idea why I would need it, honestly, as we never went on another trip to any Spanish-speaking country, but I have been doing tiny bits of it since then, just for retention and for duolingo points — Spanish course is done relatively better than, let’s say, German, and I am still at a level where I can learn new things from it. Mostly keeping at retention level. ~B1 I would say, though a bit more active for production than French. I believe that 338 hours over the past ~7 years on my goal reflect the time spent already after I finished that one college class.

Finally, the latest addition: Lithuanian, my ninth language. ~B2 over the past 27 months, as I said earlier. Of course I am very far from fluency, but I finally reached the level where natives stopped saying “well, you don’t need to be breaking your tongue…” (under which I assume they are imploring me not to maim their language) and continue in Lithuanian with me and only switch to Russian when they see my Ukrainian passport (super-logical, yeah, but I’ll leave my hypotheses on these postcolonial entanglements for a different genre).

I also touched at some point: Tatar, Turkish, ancient and modern Greek, and Yiddish. But very little is retained, regardless of the number of semesters or otherwise measured time and effort input, so it would be unfair to add them to the list. Can do a market conversation in Serbian (good afternoon, half a kilo tomatoes please, [understand the declared sum], thanks, goodbye) though never actually learned it. Because it’s Slavic, so basically comprehensible to some extent in the first place with three other Slavic languages under my hood, and because people really don’t want to use English there (unlike, e.g. [North] Macedonia). Wouldn’t be able to pull that with Hungarian or Georgian, of course.

Okay, this ended up quite an essay :slight_smile: I think I announced that I would write one in one of the intro posts in this thread, over a year ago, so thanks a lot for prompting me to finally do it.

There remains a question of why, I guess. Apart from some idea of needs and opportunities and responsibility (in Lithuania, it’s possible to go without Lithuanian — people don’t expect and don’t want foreigners to use their language[2], but I feel like I ought to take the responsibility to learn it if I want a longer connection than this stint; in Poland, many people don’t care that you might be just passing by from a different country: on Polish soil, Polish please, or simply have no skills otherwise even if they don’t espouse that idea consciously, so I can’t imagine how I would be able to pull this through if I hadn’t already known the language, even if the job itself seemingly doesn’t require language skills). It just really scratches my brain in the right way — making connections between words and slowly unraveling how languages work, discovering influences between unrelated but historically intertwined languages, and discrepancies between genetically related ones.


  1. Years later! We only started dating well after we left the instructor-student dynamics. ↩︎

  2. That’s my personal impression, of course, slightly exaggerated for the brevity. But it was AD 2026 that there finally appeared a requirement that foreigners working in service should know Lithuanian at A1(!) level. Huh? I am surprised not that they should, but that it was kind of okay, tolerable that they didn’t, before that. ↩︎

4 Likes

Thank you, as I mentioned before I enjoy reading your prose; the languages part got my attention since Lithuanian is not a popular choice.

I think this is true, but nobody would admit that. It’s not the first thought that comes to my mind.

There has to be someone that described the dynamics between the sense of community and the language it speaks. Not Sapir-Whorf, but “what’s the value of our language”. You nailed the French for example. Catalans would be an interesting case, Serbo-Croat landscape too.

The more I think about it, Poland is a closed product you buy or not, and if you do, there’s some transactional ritual where you give up something to become the part of our snowball. You can’t join, but we can let you in. Romanticised vision is that the language is very hard, also it’s not universal and narrowly geographically scoped, so it becomes important part of the identity. Language as the gatekeeper - one of possible positions of the language in the culture.

The paragraph above is my opinion (I am :poland:), so take it with a lump of salt. But it seems to explain things I’ve seen or the fact I automatically assigned value to learning Lithuanian.

Based on that, I think there’s urgency and actually a simple way to simplify my language a lot to make it easy to deal with day to day situations. The curriculum is in my head, but I never wrote it down. Abandon most of the cases, future with być plus infinitive (so skip aspect) and reduce complexity in morphology somehow, move to analytical style.

1 Like

Oh, yes, I totally agree! As someone who has been thinking about Polish discourses of national identity for quite a while now but from some distance from the topic, both as a foreigner and a scholar. I think the baggage that almost any community has built around their identity is a mess, but the Polish mess is an especially fascinating one to me. But there’s more probably, in terms of there being multiple strategies around language-as-a-token-of-Romanticist-national-identity. Polish and Lithuanian both are such exclusive tokens for these groups, like for many nations in CEE, but then expectations toward “others” using the language are very different (from my experience and some anecdotes that I heard - I couldn’t of course personally experience what people relay as a demanding and inappropriate expectation to know Polish, as I grab for any opportunity to practice myself and wouldn’t try to use another language here, an observer bias).

Are you w kraju or overseas? I was thinking so actually - could you have shared this somewhere on this forum already or was it a wild guess from my side based on your username?

I am guessing that many people would protest, but I also know quite a few language learners whom I taught who would appreciate these developments to any Slavic or Baltic language :slight_smile: Verb aspect! Who even needs that anymore.

1 Like

expectations toward “others” using the language are very different

This is why I invented this exchange mechanism, where you are granted a status once you make a sacrifice. I don’t know. Maybe I’m hallucinating. I invent explanations before offering correct question to ask :slight_smile:

Are you w kraju or overseas?

W kraju (since always), I live in Gdańsk.

1 Like

Okay, another week, another back-and-forth trip between two European capitals. Now that the paperwork and initial setup is almost done (almost, because when they issued a work email address with a typo in my name, I refused to use it and sent the paperwork back for a new one, so I still don’t have access to anything) and I have a place to sleep (also still lacking quite a few things, like an internet connection not from my phone) — the main focus of the week was actually getting ready to teach in a few days.

Derailments:

  • work_research_2bp — I was planning to do a few pomos of this, but then they[1] stole hours of potential work time from me when they subbed a train with a replacement bus. But this gave the needed respite for the following days as well. (But I really should change that post-detail respite so that I don’t get off the hook for a week every time.)
  • bookblog_wordpress — well, writing reviews on my fun reads wasn’t a priority, but this is the first bell that I will have to renegotiate this entire system somehow.
  • sleep_by_12 — this one is stupid. I was so overwhelmed with everything that I derailed on going to bed earlier, staring into my phone instead. But that’s exactly why I need this goal.

Now I have a big structural question. I am now planning a ton of reading that I will have to do alongside my students. I have this wonderful and working system for telling me how many pages I need to read daily to make the deadlines — but if I add all those lists to the normal workflow, (1) all my TBR-related goals will be overwhelmed by these new items and (2) after initially derailing I will be able to meet all the goals’ requirements by just reading what I must anyway for work, so the goals’ purpose of reminding me to regularly read a bit of those other books (purchased to read for fun, ARCs, etc.) won’t be working. As I am writing this, I am thinking that perhaps the better-of-both-worlds would be adding new tags and filters to my script, so that it would still do the calculation and graphs for those “teaching” books, but not include the data on them in what is sent to Beeminder — but I’ll need to see how cumbersome that gets.


  1. This is meant to be an irritated “they”. I mean someone in the railway company who made this weird logistical decision. ↩︎

An update on a preliminary decision regarding the issue I mentioned yesterday. I basically decided to follow the previously existing rule of thumb that the system of my TBR goals mostly exists to help me not let books purchased for future reading slip out of my mind, as well as to plan the number of pages I need to read daily to meet deadlines for ARCs and library check-outs. I wouldn’t add books that “I have to read anyway” for work (e.g., secondary literature for my research) in advance; I’ll add them once I actually start reading to track progress. This is how I’ve used the setup for months now — just adding that to clarify I’m not really bending the system much for this new situation.

So, what I decided to do is add all the titles I’m planning to read (or reread) throughout the semester, with approximate dates by which I need to finish them (a week ahead of the class for which I need them). This will help with planning daily page counts and ensuring I stay on top of things. But they’ll contribute to goals like total pages on my TBR only after I actually acquire the item (purchase or check out), and for older classics in the public domain that I’ll simply download online — once I start reading. In essence, this is really similar to how I’ve been using the system previously, only now I’ve added these titles as “ghost items” to facilitate page count planning before they’re properly added. (That’s over 7000 pages, BTW — will be even slightly more, as I am still deciding on two-three titles. But 7 of those books (~1500-2000 pp.) are something I read relatively recently, so I hope to only need a quick flip through.)

So, this was my first full week teaching at this new place. I still had to combine prep and actual classes with solving some paperwork and admin issues, but I am almost done settling in by now. That’s so far as work routines are concerned; at home, I am still bringing new pots and whatnot almost every day.

Derailments:

  • lit_anki_rotestock — I was simply too absorbed with prep that I missed the midnight to do some 10-card reviews, ugh
  • meta_days_ahead — on the first day after the extensive days of classes, derailed for the entire backlog that accumulated over the past few days while travelling, solving issues, running errands, and working, of course
  • tbr_pur_pages_stale — added a bunch of books that I purchased to read for the classes I teach; explained in more detail here

Now, while I have been adding breaks to many goals on and off since the beginning of the year, now it’s getting clear that it’s unfeasible to return to all routines, so I started adding breaks for some of the lower-priority goals for half of the semester. (I have two intensive half-semester courses, so the load is twice what it will be in the second half of the semester; a very unfortunate setup to start a job in a new university and country)

Using @aad’s tool, which allows converting units required by each goal into time estimates and thus seeing what is required over the next days in order not to derail, I saw at some point that some 29 hours were expected of me over the next week just not to derail, that is, even if I don’t do anything on the goals where I have buffers. That was shocking to see, especially since I tend to keep buffers. A mental mathematics bug, where every single new commitment is just “another small thing that would be nice to do, just for 20-30 minutes a few times a week, I have time for that, right? Right?” So I was wondering, how much I actually expect of myself if I were to move parallel to the road (or let everything slip into the red and then do just the minimum on every goal every day — I am clearly on my way here anyways, judging from the fact that meta is now in the 30s instead of the 60-70s)

So I briefly coded a script that allows estimating this total load and learned that the entire commitment is around 42 hours. And that’s not taking into account that things that are actually controlled by external circumstances rather than Beeminder (like the amount of time spent on work; my Beeminder goals are mostly about not letting certain aspects slip and about spreading the load across the week) will actually take more of my time.

And the breakdown, out of those ~42 weekly hours (with upcoming changes in italics):

  • Work: 20 hours — teaching, research, everything; it’s actually been over 32 hours this week already across aspects related to these goals (with half a day of intensive Sunday-afternoon prep remaining)
  • Reading: 4.5 hours — about half of this requirement will be covered with things that also count toward “work”, but another half is the arcs that I pre-committed to — I know I technically don’t owe anyone anything, so I will let go of this or just keep the ARCs reviews overdue if it comes to this, but keeping for now
  • “Self-expression”: 5 hours — blog posts, updates here, intend reviews, looking through my photos and posting them on iNaturalist. Added breaks on all photos-related goals; that’s clearly not a priority right now.
  • Languages: 9 hours — that’s my half-reduced Lithuanian, recently added Polish (30 min daily each), retention-level effort for Spanish and German (a few minutes daily each). Put a break for German for now, will keep Spanish with 1-2 lessons of Duolingo (for Spanish, the available levels are more relevant to being actually useful on my language acquisition journey).
  • Life organization and self-care: 1.5 hours — vitamins and micro-habits like using cuticle oil go here; of course, actual time spent on these aspects of life is way larger, but things like cooking or groceries shopping happen anyways, out of hunger, so no need to beemind them
  • Communication: ~1 hour — just my weekly zoom calls with my grandma are counted, of course I actually spend much more time on this
  • Physical activity: ~2 hours — ironically, it would be beneficial to increase this, for sanity and to compensate the ever-increasing hours of sitting at the computer (without anything close to an ergonomic setup yet)

So, that should already be ~3 hours less in a week, once the breaks kick in. Will try to reevaluate often.

If anyone is interested, I can prep a shareable version of this script. It will only require preparing a CSV file with a list of your goals with an explicit hierarchy (grouping them into categories like these if needed and also for instances when a few goals track the same activity from different points of view, e.g. when doing a yoga session will contribute both to “yoga” (times per week) and “physical activity” (minutes per week), so summing the estimates for those goals makes no sense).

This week, I am not only prepping classes but also a half-an-hour talk that I technically could have been working on for months now, but always had other urgent stuff. Well, at least my “research side” of the work goals will be satisfied for a while.

Derailments:

  • tbr_purchased - derailed when I received a bunch of books from my own shelves sent by my mom. Called it non-legit, as the goal is to control purchasing; here I have just added pre-owned books to my current collection, since they are at hand and can be read.
  • work_research_2bp - called “uncle” on Monday, as there was no way to fit in any work on that aspect with all the classes prep.

Changes:

  • I am pretty satisfied with my Polish reactivation journey right now. I count only controlled practice: one hour-long conversation club, one hour-long individual class, and writing an essay for the individual class. That’s a bit short of the 0.5 h/day / 3.5 hours/week that I set for this goal, but I don’t feel it’s necessary to force additional types of activity right now. So, I’ll lower that to 0.4/day / 2.8/week for the goal to impose consistency within this amount of workload instead of making me look for additional things to fulfill the requirement.

  • I keep waking up at 7am because the curtains aren’t black-out. So I am changing the rate for my “sleep earlier” goal to try to impose the average 11pm screens-off time (instead of 11:30 until now), to get the necessary hours of sleep.

1 Like

Okay, I somehow survived those days when regular teaching prep was combined with a workshop presentation, but then the exhaustion just turned on and I cannot really get back to normal functioning condition yet.

But Beeminder-wise it’s been a pretty calm week.

I only had one derailment for tbr_pur_pages_stale. More detail in the annual challenge thread.

New goal for the monthly challenge: lipbalm_b4_sleep.

2 Likes

I think I am gradually getting into the routine of this new job. Plus we had some really nice early-spring weather this week, and my husband came to stay with me, so we had a couple of satisfying walks in the nature.

Only derailed for my yoga goal this week. I am still using my “travelling” (thin) mat, should probably get myself a thicker one to make this practice something I rather look forward to instead of just satisfying the requirement.

1 Like

Late with the update, as I had another prep marathon for the classes this week.

Quite a few derailments over the past 10 days:

  • /teeth_hours – forgot
  • /tbr_arcs_locs – decided to derail in order to get the flat spot, as ARCs are not a priority for me right now
  • /work_research_2bp – again, as I was too busy with the teaching-side of my work, simply hadn’t the time to do the research aspect. Maybe I need a caveat that a derailment is non-legit when I am already at 40+ hours over the past 7 days for all work aspects. But I am not inventing this retrospectively, so legit this time. Hopefully will be moot in a couple of weeks when I only have 3 classes left.
  • /physicalactivity – I need to prioritize this better

Also: breaks across goals for when I travel to Vilnius in a week, just for the day on the train. But maybe I should consider adding more substantial breaks for the entire “vacation” when I will be super occupied with moving apartments and supporting my husband around a medical procedure.

I will be missing a couple of Polish classes over this trip, so added break for that for the entire vacation.

2 Likes

I am almost done with the first half of the semester, but I am so thoroughly exhausted. Just one cycle of teaching (all classes of the week) is left before the Easter break, and after that I’ll only have the exams for the half-semester intensive courses, and twice fewer classes for the remainder of the semester. Yay. Some final effort to get there, and the break is not exactly going to be vacation time, unfortunately, but it feels like it’s within reach now and something to be reasonably looking forward to.

Just one derailment since the last update: /teeth_hours – forgot again until it was too late for this goal’s requirement. Ok.

Upcoming breaks for language study, as I will be missing some classes for both Polish and Lithuanian over the spring break.

1 Like

I am currently really not grateful to the past me for thinking of this but never taking the proper action. So I have been mostly eating away any pre-existing buffers over the past few days. We have been unscrewing, packing, and lugging things (what seems like) non-stop for the past four days now.

Managed to derail on the goal for going to sleep earlier because I didn’t pay enough attention to it being in the red when I went to sleep earlier :slight_smile: (claimed non-legit)

Other than that, not much is happening with my goals. I can only imagine how low the “meta” will be when I finally run the script.